Skip to main content Skip to secondary navigation
Main content start

'DeepShake' predicts earthquake shaking intensity with AI

A deep neural network developed at Stanford and trained on more than 36,000 earthquakes offers a new way to quickly predict earthquake shaking intensity and issue early warnings of strong shaking.

Cracked concrete
DeepShake demonstrates the potential of machine learning models to improve the speed and accuracy of earthquake alert systems. (Image credit: Shutterstock)

A deep spatiotemporal neural network trained on more than 36,000 earthquakes offers a new way of quickly predicting ground shaking intensity once an earthquake is underway, researchers report at the Seismological Society of America (SSA)’s 2021 Annual Meeting.

DeepShake analyzes seismic signals in real time and issues advanced warning of strong shaking based on the characteristics of the earliest detected waves from an earthquake.

DeepShake was developed by a team of researchers at Stanford University including computer science and mathematics major Daniel J. Wu; Avoy Datta, MS '21; geophysics PhD student Weiqiang Zhu; and geophysics research professor William Ellsworth.

The earthquake data used to train the DeepShake network came from seismic recordings of the 2019 Ridgecrest, California sequence. When its developers tested DeepShake’s potential using the actual shaking of the 5 July magnitude 7.1 Ridgecrest earthquake, the neural network sent simulated alerts between 7 and 13 seconds prior to the arrival of high intensity ground shaking to locations in the Ridgecrest area.

The authors stressed the novelty of using deep learning for rapid early warning and forecasting directly from seismic records alone. “DeepShake is able to pick up signals in seismic waveforms across dimensions of space and time,” explained Datta.

DeepShake demonstrates the potential of machine learning models to improve the speed and accuracy of earthquake alert systems, he added.

“DeepShake aims to improve on earthquake early warnings by making its shaking estimates directly from ground motion observations, cutting out some of the intermediate steps used by more traditional warning systems,” said Wu.

Many early warning systems first determine earthquake location and magnitude, and then calculate ground motion for a location based on ground motion prediction equations, Wu explained.

“Each of these steps can introduce error that can degrade the ground shaking forecast,” he added.

DeepShake aims to improve on earthquake early warnings by making its shaking estimates directly from ground motion observations, cutting out some of the intermediate steps used by more traditional warning systems.

Daniel Wu Undergraduate Student, Computer Science and Mathematics

To address this, the DeepShake team turned to a neural network approach. The series of algorithms that make up a neural network are trained without the researcher identifying which signals are “important” for the network to use in its predictions. The network learns which features optimally forecast the strength of future shaking directly from the data.

“We’ve noticed from building other neural networks for use in seismology that they can learn all sorts of interesting things, and so they might not need the epicenter and magnitude of the earthquake to make a good forecast,” said Wu. “DeepShake is trained on a preselected network of seismic stations, so that the local characteristics of those stations become part of the training data.”

“When training a machine learning model end to end, we really think that these models are able to leverage this additional information to improve accuracy,” he said.

Wu, Datta and their colleagues see DeepShake as complementary to California’s operational ShakeAlert, adding to the toolbox of earthquake early warning systems. “We’re really excited about expanding DeepShake beyond Ridgecrest, and fortifying our work for the real world, including fail-cases such as downed stations and high network latency,” added Datta.

This story was adapted from a press release originally published by the Seismological Society of America (SSA).

Earthquake concept

Related research

The science behind earthquakes

October 2020

A collection of research and insights from Stanford experts on where and how earthquakes happen, why prediction remains elusive, advances in detection and monitoring, links to human activities, how to prepare for "The Big One," and more.

AI detects hidden earthquakes

October 2020

Tiny movements in Earth’s outermost layer may provide a Rosetta Stone for deciphering the physics and warning signs of big quakes. New algorithms that work a little like human vision are now detecting these long-hidden microquakes in the growing mountain of seismic data.

Media Contacts

Becky Ham
Seismological Society of America
press@seismosoc.org

Bill Ellsworth
School of Earth, Energy & Environmental Sciences
wellsworth@stanford.edu

Josie Garthwaite
School of Earth, Energy & Environmental Sciences
(650)497-0947; josieg@stanford.edu

Explore More