Stanford University
Wind turbines at sunset

Race to zero

Image credit: Shutterstock

The science behind decarbonization

A collection of research and insights from Stanford experts who are revealing the stakes of emission cuts, enabling better carbon accounting, predicting the consequences of future emission pathways and mapping out viable solutions.

BY Josie Garthwaite and Stanford Earth Staff
ClockApril 16, 2021

By the start of a virtual climate summit on Earth Day, April 22, the Biden administration is expected to outline a new target for cutting U.S. greenhouse gas emissions this decade.

Already, climate change has hurt farm productivity, caused tens of billions of dollars in flood damages in the U.S. alone, and increased the the risk of longer, more dangerous wildfire seasons in California. The goal of deep emission cuts is to slow the world’s advancement toward a dangerous temperature threshold beyond which climate impacts are likely to become more severe and widespread, including droughts, extreme heatwaves and floods.

In the 2015 Paris Climate Agreement, nearly 200 nations committed to holding this century’s average temperature to well below 2°C and to “pursuing efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels, recognizing that this would significantly reduce the risks and impacts of climate change.”

Current commitments fall short of that aspirational goal. A 2018 paper led by Stanford climate scientist Noah Diffenbaugh found the gap could considerably increase the likelihood of extreme weather. Other research suggests failing to meet the accord’s climate mitigation goals could cost the global economy tens of trillions of dollars. The lead study author, environmental economist Marshall Burke, has said, “Over the past century we have already experienced a 1-degree increase in global temperature, so achieving the ambitious targets laid out in the Paris Agreement will not be easy or cheap."

The current U.S. emission pledge, made under former President Barack Obama, targets cuts of 26 to 28 percent below 2005 levels by 2025. In November 2021, countries participating in major UN climate talks (COP26) in Glasgow, Scotland, will be expected to announce new, more ambitious plans for slashing their emissions over the next decade.

More than 300 businesses and investors have urged the Biden administration to commit to reducing greenhouse gas emissions to at least 50 percent below 2005 levels by 2030, “in pursuit of reaching net-zero emissions by 2050.” European lawmakers, trade unions, businesses and environmental groups have also called for the U.S. – the world’s largest historical carbon emitter – to cut emissions at least 50 percent below 2005 levels this decade.

Halving the nation’s emissions will require significant changes. This collection covers how scientists are evaluating the stakes of emission cuts, enabling better carbon accounting, predicting the consequences of future emission pathways and mapping out viable solutions.

Scroll down for research news and insights spanning emission targets; the role of renewable energy and grid storage; prospects for adaptation and a more equitable recovery; the future of fossil fuels and carbon capture; the promise and limits of natural climate solutions such as reforestation – and more.

Last updated: April 26, 2021

Risk of extreme weather events higher if Paris goals aren’t met

“The really big increases in record-setting event probability are reduced if the world achieves the aspirational targets rather than the actual commitments,” said Stanford professor Noah Diffenbaugh. “At the same time, even if those aspirational targets are reached, we still will be living in a climate that has substantially greater probability of unprecedented events than the one we’re in now.”

Navigate to Risk of extreme weather events higher if Paris goals aren’t met
Read more

Global carbon emissions need to shrink 10 times faster

Among the dozens of countries that reduced their emissions 2016-2019, carbon dioxide emissions fell at roughly one tenth the rate needed worldwide to hold global warming well below 2°C relative to preindustrial levels, a new study finds.

Navigate to Global carbon emissions need to shrink 10 times faster
Read more

A roadmap to reducing greenhouse gas emissions 50 percent by 2030

An international group of experts, including Stanford Earth system scientist Rob Jackson, has published a roadmap of the most viable solutions for slashing greenhouse gas emissions globally by 2030. 

Navigate to A roadmap to reducing greenhouse gas emissions 50 percent by 2030
Read more

Avoiding blackouts with 100% renewable energy

Researchers propose three separate ways to avoid blackouts if the world transitions all its energy to electricity or direct heat and provides the energy with 100 percent wind, water and sunlight. The solutions reduce energy requirements, health damage and climate damage.

Navigate to Avoiding blackouts with 100% renewable energy
Stanford News

When 100% renewable energy doesn't mean zero carbon

As power grids move away from fossil fuels, companies seeking to cut out carbon emissions will have to go beyond commitments to renewable energy. 

Navigate to When 100% renewable energy doesn't mean zero carbon
Read more

The dollars and sense of big batteries on the grid

Storing energy produced by wind or solar for later use has a challenge competing with existing natural gas-fired generation units. But batteries designed for the job could ease the way.

Navigate to The dollars and sense of big batteries on the grid
Read more

Tracking California's 2030 climate goals

Electricity has a clear path to decarbonization, Stanford Law School lecturer Danny Cullenward tells NPR. "The technologies that cut the emissions are things we have and we know how to work with. That's installing solar plants. That's installing wind plants. That's putting in battery energy storage systems. And we have the right policies and tools to get it done." 

Navigate to Tracking California's 2030 climate goals
NPR

What happens when schools go solar?

Rooftop solar projects at schools could reduce harmful air pollution, help the environment and enhance student learning while cutting electricity costs, a new study finds.

Navigate to What happens when schools go solar?
Read more

Green New Deal: The science behind the politics

"We need to move as quickly as we can with technologies that are ready to go, like wind and solar power, and continue to develop other critical components of a deeply decarbonized energy system like large-scale weekly to seasonal energy storage," said energy resources engineering professor Sally Benson.

Navigate to Green New Deal: The science behind the politics
Read more

Are we underestimating the benefits of investing in renewable energy?

Scientists have estimated the emissions intensity of carbon dioxide and other air pollutants from a major electricity distributor and highlighted key consequences – essential information for policymakers shaping decisions to reduce electricity system emissions.

Navigate to Are we underestimating the benefits of investing in renewable energy?
Read more

Tracking power plant emissions in real time

Stanford scientists have developed a precise way to measure U.S. power plant emissions 24/7. The new tool will enable grid operators and big electricity consumers to reduce their carbon footprint in real time.

Navigate to Tracking power plant emissions in real time
Read more

What does net zero emissions mean for Big Oil? Not what you’d think.

“I have grave misgivings about gigaton-scale natural solutions,” or forestry offsets, said Stanford Earth system science professor Rob Jackson. “And gigaton-scale is the only thing that matters when we’re talking about the coal and oil and natural gas industries.”

Navigate to What does net zero emissions mean for Big Oil? Not what you’d think.
Inside Climate News

Adaptation to climate change: What do the data say?

Research suggests large reductions in economic productivity can persist many years after a storm, yet few people connect foregone earnings today to a hurricane long past, economist Solomon Hsiang said in a discussion moderated by Stanford's Marshall Burke. The role of the policymaker, Hsiang said, could be fostering innovation that will bring the cost of adaptation technology down, or helping populations feel some of the more subtle impacts as something that will be more salient.

Navigate to Adaptation to climate change: What do the data say?
Watch

Investing in a clean and equitable recovery

"We got to where we are now on climate through a history of white supremacy, extraction, exploitation," Alicia Seiger, managing director of the Sustainable Finance Initiative at Stanford's Precourt Institute for Energy tells Climate One. "That requires a path forward built on new systems with new representation, and that the solutions to climate expand far beyond simple carbon math."

Navigate to Investing in a clean and equitable recovery
Climate One

Learning from history

"I think one thing that history can really offer to fixing the climate problem is to say look, we have known about this climate issue for a very long time for many, many decades. How is it that we have made such unsatisfactory progress in dealing with it," said Benjamin Franta, a Stanford PhD student researching the history of science. 

Navigate to Learning from history
Climate One

Reducing global food system emissions key to meeting climate goals

Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from food systems will be vital to reaching climate goals – and it will require coordinated action across sectors and between national governments, according to new research coauthored by Inês Azevedo, associate professor of energy resources engineering. 

Navigate to Reducing global food system emissions key to meeting climate goals
Read more

Meat, health and the environment

Nutrition expert Christopher Gardner discusses the protein-consuming habits of America, the drawbacks and ways to eat better.

Navigate to Meat, health and the environment
Read more

Methane emissions climb

The pandemic has tugged carbon emissions down, temporarily. But levels of the powerful heat-trapping gas methane continue to climb, dragging the world further away from a path that skirts the worst effects of global warming.

Navigate to Methane emissions climb
Read more

Why laughing gas is a growing climate problem

Nitrous oxide, also known as “laughing gas,” is the most important greenhouse gas after methane and carbon dioxide and the biggest human-related threat to the ozone layer. Stanford scientist Rob Jackson explains why emissions of the gas are rising faster than expected and what it will take to reverse the trend.

Navigate to Why laughing gas is a growing climate problem
Read more

Landscape disruptions threaten Paris climate agreement goals

A new study finds emissions from deforestation, conversion of wild landscapes to agriculture, and other changes in land use worldwide contributed 25 percent of all human-caused emissions between 2001 and 2017. Expanding agricultural production in Latin America, Southeast Asia and sub-Saharan Africa has propelled the global increase.

Navigate to Landscape disruptions threaten Paris climate agreement goals
Read more

Congress must act to solve the methane problem

"We’re unlikely to be able to keep global warming within 1.5 degrees Celsius without cutting methane emissions ... also finding ways to neutralize methane already in the atmosphere," write Rob Jackson of Stanford and Daphne Wysham of the NGO Methane Action in an op-ed.

Navigate to Congress must act to solve the methane problem
The Hill

Water heaters' methane leaks are high, but fixable

Emissions of methane, a potent greenhouse gas, from water heaters are higher than previously estimated, especially for a new type of heater growing in popularity, a new Stanford study finds. But simple fixes exist.

Navigate to Water heaters' methane leaks are high, but fixable
Read more

How to close the clean-energy divide

An engineer and clean-energy entrepreneur discusses the troubling socio-economic gap in access to sustainable energy and the things we can do now to narrow and, perhaps, close it.

Navigate to How to close the clean-energy divide
Future of Everything

The Trump administration's environmental legacy can be undone. Here's how.

With transportation belching out 28 percent of US carbon emissions, fuel economy will have to be a big part of the new administration’s climate plan. “The government needs to create a regulatory market through policies and subsidies,” Stanford environmental law professor Deborah Sivas tells Popular Science. “In the end, that’s what’s going to move the ball for industry – just like how these car companies got on board in California.”

Navigate to The Trump administration's environmental legacy can be undone. Here's how.
Popular Science

Environment and energy after COVID-19

"Almost $50 billion of stimulus funding after the 2008 recession helped transform wind and solar power and energy conservation. We’re still reaping the benefits today from green power, historically cheap wind and solar contracts and a clean-energy industry that employs three million Americans. We have the same chance to reshape transportation now," said Stanford professor Rob Jackson. 

Navigate to Environment and energy after COVID-19
Read more

EVs plus clean energy grids key to reducing climate change and air pollution

Researchers examined the most beneficial vehicle fuel technology for transportation in the US and the trade-off between decarbonization and air pollution mitigation. The results show electric vehicle use must accompany clean energy grids to mitigate both climate change and air pollution.

Navigate to EVs plus clean energy grids key to reducing climate change and air pollution
Read more

Cash, carbon, crude: How to make oil fields bury emissions

A new analysis looks at what it would take for oil companies to start pumping millions of tons of carbon dioxide into their wells to boost crude production – and what it would mean for the climate.

Navigate to Cash, carbon, crude: How to make oil fields bury emissions
Read more

Researchers find carbon capture a financial opportunity for U.S. biofuels

With recent tax credits and other policies, removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and storing it underground is not only possible but profitable for U.S. biofuel refineries. "“There’s really no scenario that meets the world’s climate goals without negative emissions,” said Katharine Mach.

Navigate to Researchers find carbon capture a financial opportunity for U.S. biofuels
Read more

Biden and CCS: Plans, politics, pitfalls

"Increasingly carbon removal is being taken seriously," said Dan Reicher, a senior research scholar at Stanford who was on the energy transition team for former President Obama and helped put together the 2009 stimulus package. "It's become a mainstream option, and now the question is, 'Can it really be proven to work at scale and cost effectively?' That's the open question."

Navigate to Biden and CCS: Plans, politics, pitfalls
E&E News

To curb climate change, we have to suck carbon from the sky. But how?

Once considered a distraction, scientists now say using technology—and nature – to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere is not only possible: It’s a must.

Navigate to To curb climate change, we have to suck carbon from the sky. But how?
National Geographic

Revealing cost of a key climate solution

New research suggests managing and disposing of high salinity brines – a by-product of efficient underground carbon sequestration – will impose significant energy and emissions penalties. The work quantifies these penalties for different management scenarios and provides a framework for making the approach more energy efficient.

Navigate to Revealing cost of a key climate solution
Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment

Study casts doubt on carbon capture

“There is a lot of reliance on carbon capture in theoretical modeling, and by focusing on that as even a possibility, that diverts resources away from real solutions,” said Stanford engineering professor Mark Z. Jacobson. “It gives people hope that you can keep fossil fuel power plants alive. It delays action. In fact, carbon capture and direct air capture are always opportunity costs.”

Navigate to Study casts doubt on carbon capture
Read more

Media Contacts

Josie Garthwaite

School of Earth, Energy & Environmental Sciences

(650) 497-0947; josieg@stanford.edu

IconsList of icons used on the sitemaillinkedindouble carrot leftarrow leftdouble carrotplayerinstagramclosecarrotquotefacebooktwitterplusminussearchmenuarrowcloudclock